Sunday, August 29, 2010

Big news at Flickr


Dead quick post this one. In fact, it's simply instruction to point your browser here. There's not only some interesting pterosaury information on offer, but also a big announcement. Well, big for me, anyway.

The adjacent Pteranodon image, by the way, has nothing to do with anything mentioned here or there: he's just jazzing up the post a bit.

7 comments:

  1. The logic of this launching method would work well for the dynamics of large pterosaurs like pteranodon and the larger azhdarchids. I am not convinced that this is the case for all pterosaurs. Some ornithosaurids and smaller species had proportionally better deveoped femurs. I suspect that pterosaur lauching techniques were very diverse and different launch methods would work in different situations. For the larger pterosaurs, this idea of launching resolves a lot of problems.

    ReplyDelete
  2. While the forces at work for smaller pterosaurs will be considerably reduced because of their much lower masses, the arguments outlined over at Flickr apply to the smaller critters just as much as the bigguns. Consider the relationship of gait to launch method and the fact that smaller pterosaur limbs scale in the same way as their bigger brethren: it's not as obvious, but it still applies. I'm not quite sure which taxa you're referring to with 'ornithosaurids': do you mean ornithocheirids? If so, their hindlimbs (in fact, everything behind the shoulders, really) were pretty dinky (see this image of Zhenyuanopterus for an example): I would argue that these guys were among the most likely quad launchers of the lot.

    That said, I do agree with you that there was scope for different launch methods, though I think it's more related to the specific location of the pterosaur more than anything else. Climbing pterosaurs, for instance, may have been very happy to simply leap into the air from their perches, whilst water launchers, Mike Habib recently told us, have their own take on the quad launch to become airborne.

    ReplyDelete
  3. https://balapan888.blogspot.com/
    https://badminton808.blogspot.com/
    https://perahu888.blogspot.com/
    https://bowling888.blogspot.com/
    https://boxing808.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  4. Apple already includes Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start out, nonetheless it is presently hampered by way of the lack of ability toward keep locally on your iPod, and contains a dismal 64kbps little bit rate. If this adjustments, then it will relatively negate this comfort for the Zune, nevertheless the 10 music for every month will still be a big plus inside Zune Pass’ desire.
    https://joget888.blogspot.com/
    https://niceberita.blogspot.com/
    https://sepeda808.blogspot.com/
    https://gambling808.blogspot.com/
    https://skating888.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  5. I am going to tools this research to 2 designs of All those: latest Zune house owners who are considering an improve, and These trying in the direction of decide amongst a Zune and an iPod. (There are other gamers well worth looking at out there, which include the Sony Walkman X, still I assume this delivers your self more than enough facts to create an aware preference of the Zune vs gamers other than the iPohttps://cetakan888.blogspot.com/
    https://gadai888.blogspot.com/
    https://hobbie888.blogspot.com/
    https://jaga808.blogspot.com/
    https://photo188a.blogspot.com/
    d line as very well.)

    ReplyDelete
  6. If you are nonetheless on the fence: get your most loved earphones, brain down in direction of a Excellent Purchase and question in the direction of plug them into a Zune then an iPod and perspective which just one sounds better toward you, and which interface tends to make by yourself smile extra. Then you are going to comprehend which is specifically for by yourself.
    https://seni888.blogspot.com/
    https://dahsyatnyaberita.blogspot.com/
    https://buku888.blogspot.com/
    https://bisnis808.blogspot.com/
    https://priakencan888.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete